I can't even tell who should be more offended.

I have nothing against abstinence, but this actual quote from the Human Life Alliance's "Just for Girls" magazine, which is a sort of handbook to the complex art of not boning, is so utterly ridiculous. But I honestly have no idea whether or not it's more offensive to women or men. What do you think?

"Girls, next time you do your final mirror check in the morning-- check this out! Dressing modestly is a crucial element in staying abstinent until marriage. Dressing modestly is important if you desire to protect and assist the guys in your life who wish to remain abstinent as well. You might think that it's "their problem," but guys are wired differently from girls in what turns them on. Guys are visual, so when a girl is dressing to show off (wearing tight pants, low cut shirts, etc...) it is hard for guys because they are stimulated by what they see...Start respecting yourself and your guy friends by dressing modestly!"

P.S., I'm currently watching a show on the Eternal Word Television Network called "Defending Life." Why do I fish for furious indignation so? It's also basically just a slide show of ultrasound photos and aborted fetus pictures set to a (male) priest citing Biblical passages. Can we note, for a moment, that while the pro-choice movement tends to lean more to the pragmatic (as opposed to moralist) end of the argument spectrum, the anti-choicers tend to use lots of scary pictures and shock tactics.
Also, instead of commercials, there are just PSAs featuring women who claim to have had abortions and sunk into a depression/weren't able to conceive/went crazy afterwards...funny, considering that the idea of a post-abortion syndrome has been dismissed by pretty much the entire medical community.